Mattvanders wrote:
As I said on one of the other post, my frame can and has run 26" and 27.5" wheels. Was there much difference? Not loads but going by strava time I was quicker going up and down on the bigger wheels. You do roll over rougher ground quicker (which to be honest you don't get local. rocky Wales or national peaks riding or abroad is where it's worth it). The only other thing I would say is the newer 27.5 frames have way better geometry which make the biggest difference.
If you have still got the dmr I would just carry on using it to get back in to ridding before upgrading in 6 months time
PS I would also say there are even more new hub spacing standards now so it may be worth waiting to see what becomes the norm before committing (142 v 148 boost for rear and 100 v 110 boost front)
If you do look at new bikes have a look at whtye's 900 range
The geometry of my dmr exalt frame is near on identical to the nukeproof scout, which is a 650b- even with ride sag taken into account. So the frame is absolutely no issue.
And i looked at the whyte 900s but (here is the eternal which bike chatter) think that due to my 6ft3 height the scout has better sizing, and the other maybe is a ragley marley or piglet.
But it appears i could have a bunch of saint stuff and premium wheels, etc for the same price as the deore spec new bikes.
If theres not much in the ride then i think ill maybe go for the upgrades. I will mostly ride danbury and colchester bike park where theres a fair bit of twists and turns so it could well be the smaller wheel is better suited.
Then....heres a thought...if i leave my new fork (160 or 170mm) steerer tube long enough i could have option of getting a fs frame and transferring the trick stuff.....
Oooo choices.